This search combines search strings from the content search (i.e. "Full Text", "Author", "Title", "Abstract", or "Keywords") with "Article Type" and "Publication Date Range" using the AND operator.
Beilstein J. Nanotechnol. 2020, 11, 1822–1833, doi:10.3762/bjnano.11.164
Figure 1: X-ray diffractograms when using different complexing agents.
Figure 2: X-ray diffractograms when using different solvents.
Figure 3: (a) X-ray diffractograms of BiFeO3-0, x% samples with equimolar, 2%, 3% and 5% of bismuth excess, c...
Figure 4: XRD pattern of 5.5 nm BiFeO3 NP.
Figure 5: TEM of BiFeO3 samples (a) nanocast 5.5 nm BiFeO3 particles (b) particle size analysis (c) particles...
Figure 6: Absorbance spectra and Tauc plot (inset) for 5.5 nm BiFeO3 nanoparticles.
Figure 7: Photocatalytic degradation of RhB as a function of irradiation time under visible light using diffe...
Figure 8: Kinetics of the photocatalytic degradation of RhB using different catalysts.
Figure 9: Effect of catalyst concentration on the degradation of RhB.
Figure 10: Evaluation of photocatalytic stability and reusability of 5.5 nm BiFeO3 NP in a total of five cycle...
Figure 11: Photocatalytic degradation of RhB using 5.5 nm BiFeO3 NPs as photocatalyst under different pH condi...
Figure 12: Mechanistic investigation of the photocatalytic degradation of RhB by using different radical scave...